Push to ‘Pay Up’ Stops Brands from Stealing Billions during Pandemic

Covid-19 Tracker: Which Brands Acted Responsibly toward Suppliers and Workers?

This tracker and the underlying analysis were provided by the Worker Rights Consortium (WRC) in association with the Center for Global Workers’ Rights (CGWR) at Pennsylvania State University. This tracker reflects where brands stood as of April 2021.

Covid-19 meant a huge drop in demand for apparel. We recognized the financial challenges this created for brands and retailers; at the same time, corporations had a responsibility to manage the crisis responsibly and honor obligations to suppliers and workers. Many brands and retailers responded to the crisis by canceling (or “holding”) orders or demanding retroactive price reductions, for goods already in production or completed and ready to ship. In some cases, brands demanded large rebates, even on orders already in transit from the supplier. Research showed this led to large-scale dismissals of workers, often without legally mandated severance or furlough pay. To their credit, some brands and retailers committed to pay in full for all apparel orders already in production or completed, greatly reducing harm to suppliers and workers. Others did not made this commitment and either canceled all orders or imposed cancellations or rebates on a supplier-by-supplier basis. The WRC, in association with CGWR, monitored and reported on the positions of leading corporations from March 2020 through April 2021.

How the determinations were made

Committed to Pay in Full for Orders Completed and in Production:

  • adidas
  • Amazon
  • ASOS
  • C&A for more info
  • Cotton On Group for more info
  • Gap Inc. (Old Navy, Athleta, Banana Republic) for more info
  • H&M
  • IKEA
  • Inditex (Zara)
  • Kiabi
  • Levi Strauss & Co. for more info
  • LPP
  • Lululemon Athletica
  • Marks & Spencer
  • Moschino
  • Next
  • Nike
  • Primark  for more info
  • PVH (Calvin Klein, Tommy Hilfiger)
  • Ralph Lauren Corporation (Polo)
  • Target
  • Tesco
  • Under Armour
  • UNIQLO
  • VF Corp. (JanSport, The North Face, Vans, Timberland)

Made No Commitment to Pay in Full for Orders Completed and in Production:

Note: Brand names in parentheses are owned by the listed company. 

Last updated: April 21, 2021

How the Determinations Were Made

Brands listed as having made a commitment to pay in full met the following criteria, with respect to all orders placed (and on which fabric was cut) prior to the inception of the crisis:

Determination of each corporation’s status was based on one or more of the following sources: public statements by the corporation (including statements reported by credible news sources), direct correspondence with the WRC and/or CGWR, information provided by country-level associations of suppliers, information provided by individual suppliers. The WRC and CGWR continually monitored whether corporations that committed to act responsibly were honoring this commitment in their direct dealings with suppliers. If we determined that a corporation was not honoring its commitment, the supplier’s designation was changed.